this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
201 points (92.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
607 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pretty much what the title says. I know he's a former president and has all of his supporters, but what's the official reason? Thanks.

(page 2) 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Bit of a difference between outright theft and a civil dispute over the value of a property put up for a loan,

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

I mean, if you want to stay safe in life, maybe don’t make your own last name “Fried”

[–] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Oh my sweet summer child

The law does not exist

There is a genocide in Gaza that the entire world said stop with a 'non binding resolution '

The law

Does not

Exist. (Unless you're poor lol)

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Well the legal system doesn't exist on paper. Laws are not what the legal system operates on. Allegedly, breaking a law is what allows, but doesn't require, the legal system to be involved at all.

So to answer your question, Sam Bankman is a nobody, that no one likes, and caused a very public number of people to lose a lot of money. His case is a slam-dunk, and has no further implications. Trump is a former president who did exactly the same shit that every other former president has done since Washington. So prosecuting him for his crimes now means that the power brokers of the US empire are now potentially open to prosecution. So of course the two aren't going to be comparable.

So there is no "official reason" because officially the judicial system is based on individual discretion.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›