Technology

59578 readers

3344 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

614

Scientists successfully replicate historic nuclear fusion breakthrough three times (www.cnn.com)

submitted 11 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Could we somehow capture the steam from all the kettles to turn a turbine? I see zero problems with this plan.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Coal or nuclear, it's all steam baby

[–] ThePancake@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I know this is probably tongue in cheek, but I genuinely thought the same until recently. There's a company called Helion which is developing a really cool fusion process that doesn't use steam as an energy transfer mechanism. Obviously it has its own set of drawbacks and roadblocks, but still really cool tech in the making.

Here's the video I saw going into detail on it if anyone's interested:

https://youtu.be/_bDXXWQxK38?si=iBpHfDxhRgHHRtN2

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I hope this actually pans out, but I am suspicious that it won’t. Mostly just because of they way they have this air of tech bro hype around them; hopefully I just learned about it through poor sources because it would be freakin cool if it worked

[–] ThePancake@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yep, this was pretty much my exact reaction as well. I haven't really dug into it since, but it was an interesting twist on fusion that would be sweet if it made some progress!

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh yeah I've seen that one.

Honestly I don't have high hopes, they believe their next model will solve the shortcomings they face with it's size, but that could reveal a whole other set of issues.

[–] ThePancake@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Same, expectations are definitely in check, but cool none the less! I feel like there are a lot of hiccups here that would need to be smoothed out before this would become anything remotely feasible.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/_bDXXWQxK38?si=iBpHfDxhRgHHRtN2

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] atocci@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We're gonna spin those turbines so good

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

And we’re gonna have the mexicans pay for it.

[–] doofy77@aussie.zone 11 points 11 months ago

The UK will become an energy powerhouse.