this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
207 points (97.3% liked)
Asklemmy
51215 readers
420 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They'd try, but there will be corporations bidding from thousands of miles away completely out of reach of any mob action these days.
If we reach penny auction status (and we will), it will be back to functional feudalism for most.
At that point the community can just refuse to recognize the sale and not let the company onto the property after the sale. The key to these kinds of protests is to make the fight unprofitable.
Yea, which will work for about 30 minutes until the police show up, who are already used to defending property over lives.
The government doesn't have to be profitable. That's part of socializing business cost, just like how many people that work at walmart are on food stamps. A corrupt government loves to subsidize the rich.
You talk like people couldn't just escalate further when they absolutely could. Need people to stop undermining collective action with their pessimism
I'm not saying don't do it. I'm saying don't expect easy answers like the post implies.
I thought the same thing at first. However after reading another comment here I realised that a community can essentially sack the property if a huge corp buys it. Not much you can do if everyone around wants you gone so bad they'll commit arson rather than let you stay.
I hope you don't have to find out how naive that view is.
So you burn down the farm house. What about the fields? The equipment? The person who was kicked off the land already by then is still destitute. Now you've burned their old home down.
Now what? MAD only works when the damage can be equally devastating, and the community will already be devastated by then.
The point was more that a community can enforce that "if they don't get it, no one will", which I think would put a lot of companies off from buying.
It wouldn't help the first few people get their home back, but after a couple rounds, the big corps will see that they end up losing money when the buy properties that are sacked a short time later. If there's one thing that will make a company change its behaviour, it's making them lose money through that behaviour.
Again, MAD only works when the damage is equally devastating on both sides.
People from many countries have fought against worse abuse of power than just corrupt cops, heck this country was founded after fighting and defeating it's colonial ruler in civil war, why can't people fight back again.
If you think fighting rich corporations with guns by the time they're scooping up farms is how it should be fought, you've already lost.
Just because you've lost doesn't mean you should give up, that's how they keep you down, you need to have a positive outlook as well while acknowledge that there issues and keep arguing for things to get better.
Yes, but taking bad tacts that won't actually change the trajectory of things is only going to disillusion people further.
all it takes is a single call from the buyer and the place will be swatted
Exactly what i was thinking