this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
788 points (98.3% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

5234 readers
28 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (18 children)

The US absolutely needs more and better trains. But also, the US has large areas with no population. That's why when you look at electoral maps you need to control population density.

Even with a high quality rail system with support for populated areas of the US the map would still have large gaps and wouldn't be nearly as full as the EU map.

Simply putting two maps side by side and saying "this one bad" isn't great. Yes, it's absolutely bad, but for the exact reasons this map shows.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Yeah, but excluding entire states is ridiculous.

[–] grammerly_dave@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

Is it? There are entire states with populations less than that of major cities.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)