this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7716 readers
1276 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Do these scooters cause even a tiny fraction of the issues that cars do? I wonder...

Prague officials said they had acted on complaints from residents over the dangers of the scooters whizzing by on pavements or in parks, or blocking pavements or street parking spots when not in use.

As usual the issue is whiners who don't understand the reality that scooters are going to be way less disruptive than if those people were to drive instead. No reason a scooter can't occupy a parking space in my mind.

[โ€“] Unrelated@feddit.nl 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

As a pedestrian on a pavement I have a greater issue with scooters than cars. Especially where I live there are a lot, and they don't care about the 6km speed limit on the pavement (neither do cyclists however). Since scooters are often rental ones, they are thrown in bushes, rivers etc. Bicycles are often personal items, so they don't get strewn around, and the rentals have specific parking spots.

Primarily the rules should be enforced better and traffic rules should be taught better/at a younger age. But I think scooters are easier to misuse than bicycles or cars. Also, motorists need formal training, while scooters can be used by people without a license. There are lot of young teenagers using them here.

Many motorists here are dicks here too though, but they mostly are only a concern when I cross a street. So I wouldn't say less or more, but many scooterists invade a space that is reserved for pedestrians. Maybe scooters need some low entry training or something.

[โ€“] DistrictSIX@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The problem you're describing sounds more like an issue with space allocation. You mention that motorists are only an issue when you cross the street. Have you ever thought about the ratio of the space allocated to lanes for cars versus the space allocated to everyone else? It sounds like city planners over the years have allocated a far too large a portion of public space to cars, forcing pedestrians and scooters, among others, to compete over what's left.

I work as a city planner, and experience this constantly. The space allocated to cars makes everyone else fight and compete over the small share that's left, and none asks why we aren't all demanding that space be reallocated from cars to other modes of transport instead of cramming everybody in the pedestrian pathways.

If there was space available in a separated bike lane, most scooters would likely prefer riding there instead of on the pavement. But if they have to share the space with 2 ton steel projectiles, then most take their chances with the pedestrians. It's all a question of what a municipality chooses to prioritize when it comes to allocating public space.

[โ€“] Unrelated@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago

Don't get me wrong, I am all for low traffic cities.

I think it is rather other than space allocation, though. (Broad) cycling lanes are rapidly increasing, and pavements are generally broad (like roads). Space allocation could be improved upon, but I believe it far from the main cause.

Specifically for scooters, it is part behaviour and part consequence of easy access to heavy scooters. I don't think scooters are in-and-of-themselves a problematic transport method, I think rental scooters are.

At the same time it is worth to consider the downsides of certain modes of transportation, instead of only comparing them to cars and their infrastructure. I just don't think the discussion needs to be a what-aboutism. Especially considering the lack for some formal training, making many of the users of scooters a hazard for others and themselves.

load more comments (3 replies)