this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
362 points (96.6% liked)

RPGMemes

14180 readers
901 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I would go line of fire logic.

You theoretically can not target the wall, but you can target something on the outerside and will then hit the wall instead

[–] jounniy@ttrpg.network 17 points 1 month ago (8 children)

As I have said in another comment, that is RAW not what would happen:

"You can’t even cast it on something behind the wall, because you cannot target something (or someone) with a spell if they are behind total cover. Total cover is created by being behind completely behind an obstacle (like a wall). This counts even if the obstacle is invisible."

Furthermore, because if you chose an invalid target for a spell, you’d still expend the spellslot but there would be no effect. So you actually spend a sixth level spell a lot to achieve nothing."

It’s very much not RAI I'd say and I would likely handle exactly like you described, but the RAW was so wonky that I wanted to make the meme when I found out about it.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I guess you're talking about 2024 rules? Because old 5e rules are different and don't have this flaw.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)