this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
42 points (79.2% liked)
United States | News & Politics
8609 readers
293 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Weird way to admit you're illiterate if I'm being real. There's no way you come away with this opinion as it being insubstantial unless you 1) didn't read it or 2) did read it but was unable or unwilling to comprehend it.
Wow, rude
This place is very compassionate for people with US reading comprehension. There's no shame in admitting "I don't understand," but there is in, "therefore it's wrong."
Compassion is not a word I would use for most interactions here. :D People are very stuck in their own interpretations of certain words, and not a single person has been able to point out what they think is good or accurate about the article. "Lol you cannot read retard" is the most common answer.
I got that many people have a different understand of the word "liberal". The article also seems to group a bunch of people under that umbrella and that makes little sense to me.
It's not really that I don't understand, I just disagree with the generalization that "all liberals bad". I do get that that does not fit thr general narrative in this social circle. But I tend to think that this kind of bashing articles are not really useful, and discussing with people who have different opinions is good to broaden one's understanding of the world.
You came in arrogant and self assured. Insults are regrettable, and the interaction could have been better handled, and you might have bothered respectfully asking for resources, bothering to read and taking time to digest, and asking for clarity or rebuttals to your presumptions. Instead, when informed you are incorrect, you doubled, tripled and quadrupled down.