this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
227 points (99.1% liked)

World News

50032 readers
2559 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 day ago (5 children)

On one hand, I agree with all the concerns listed in the article. Of course it's all in the implementation. Digital ID doesn't necessarily have to be terribly implemented and a privacy nightmare, but I doubt any current government would implement it any other way.

That said, it makes me pretty grumpy that people are happy enough to have corporations like google, amazon, facebook, et al know everything about them, but somehow a government ID is a bridge too far.

[–] DiscussionBear@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I don't agree with the digital ID since it has implications to snowball further down road into a tool for a implemented authoritarian surveillance state.

But the fact everyone basically carries a smartphone with personal data that is linked to private corporations is kinda ironic.

Like the government can't have a digital footprint of you but Google, Apple, Samsung etc can.

I'm sure these private companies are the bastions of privacy. They surely won't sell your data or bend over to government subpoenas at the first real threat to their bottom line.

No discussion regarding this digital ID has rwally mentioned this and I find it incredibly concerning.

There should be base line regulation stopping this both at the private and governmental levels. But if the last 5ish years have shown in the world, most people are realistically comfrontable and complacent in all this. At least until the gestapo are at your door., but then it's a week bit too late isn't it.

load more comments (4 replies)