this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
891 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

17054 readers
2819 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] T156@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I honestly don't think that they paid that much. Most of it is probably just some stock animation that they bought and use, rather than anything specific.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 6 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

100 million budget. It's almost a million a minute and you think they slap stock animations for close up plot points and run the risk of having 5% of the audience going "those number are silly wtf am I watching"?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's literally what stock animations exist for lmao

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They exist for fast or budgeted productions.

I feel dumb just having to argue that.

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Only a handful of movies like Avatar gets actual effort put into fully custom fake interfaces, where the producer has a big vision. But even most other blockbuster releases don't get that. Fast & The Furious with a dozen movies in the series? Nah. Anything where what's on the screen is just filler will simply not get a big budget for interfaces. Even for big budget movies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)