this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
1427 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59555 readers
3435 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In one of the coolest and more outrageous repair stories in quite some time, three white-hat hackers helped a regional rail company in southwest Poland unbrick a train that had been artificially rendered inoperable by the train’s manufacturer after an independent maintenance company worked on it. The train’s manufacturer is now threatening to sue the hackers who were hired by the independent repair company to fix it.

After breaking trains simply because an independent repair shop had worked on them, NEWAG is now demanding that trains fixed by hackers be removed from service.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sanqueue@lemmy.world 64 points 11 months ago (4 children)

This is good. Someone did that for printers too

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (3 children)

And American Weight (?) digital scales. The ones that brick themselves after 2,000 uses because how dare you only pay once.

[–] jucelc@lemmy.wtf 31 points 11 months ago

Lol. Always suspected there was a scam there, but every time I bring it up in a conversation - people just call me a conspiracy theorist.

This goes for pretty much everything though. Planned obsolescence is real, but people think it's just the natural way of things.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)