this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2025
154 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
14016 readers
1153 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've seen some alright takes about the dangers of adventurism from this but honestly it just feels like fun policing rn. Save it for next week atleast
It can also undermine class struggle by weakening revolutionaries directly. Not just innocent third parties. Lenin lost his brother to adventurism. He was against it, because it's not organized. If we started advocating for it, we would lose comrades. You could argue, that one could build orgs and support networks and everything to mitigate risks, and get the masses on our side first, but then it wouldn't be adventurism anymore, just regular class struggle.
The important thing about moments like this is to capture the revolutionary potential they reveal and funnel it into our orgs.
Weather underground not adventurism?
How?
I don't know in this case. I'm not from the US. But for example in the case of the health care CEO, it was plain to see, how even libs and conservatives were happy or at least didn't condem it.
Are there any libs who are on the fence maybe? Giving context about all the harm that person did and about the larger class struggle around it might help some people. Like, how the billionaires stole from us first, in order to pay this fascist to spread their lies.
So, anyway, I think we're still allowed to celebrate.
But even in that case what funneling happened?
That's a good point! I didn't think of the perspective that it's a waste of (potential) comrades. Charlie Kirk now isn't worth the loss of a potential Lyudmila Pavlichenko later on (if they catch the shooter etc...). Thanks!