this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
276 points (95.4% liked)

World News

38826 readers
2060 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This iconic mouse is weeks away fromn being in the public domain Jan. 1, 2024, is the day when 'Steamboat Willie' enters the public domain

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 21 points 10 months ago (39 children)

. Later forms of the mouse, including the iconic white-gloved version with red shorts, will still be protected by copyright, according to The New York Times.

WTF is this shitty loophole? "Well, we changed his clothes, that's a whole new different character!" This makes no sense. Copyright should be abolished.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 45 points 10 months ago (27 children)

I disagree. That would just result in corporations like Disney ripping off independent artists.

But limit it to the artist's life time or perhaps 25 years.

IRC drug patents last only 20 years, and those often cost a lot of money to develop, research and bring to market.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 25 points 10 months ago (18 children)

That would just result in corporations like Disney ripping off independent artists.

Fucking thank you.

The whole "copyrights should be abolished" trope is regurgitated by people who have clearly never created anything in their life. For artists, musicians, and other content creators, copyright is vital to our lives.

If you think Disney is powerful now, imagine what Disney would be like if no other creators had any legal protection at all.

[–] Jaded@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The problem is that copyright law is never used by the small artists to protect their work, it's only used by big corporations to put down the small artists, fuck with each other and find loop holes to abuse of it.

There's what it should be for and what it's actually used for.

[–] rentar42@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

You're approaching a relevant part (that big corporations have an overwhelming power advantage in this "negotiation"), but "small artists never use copyright law" is just wrong:

Without copyright law they couldn't even sell their content (or more accurately: they could sell it, but the big corp could simply copy it and sell it better/cheaper due to the economics of scale).

So without copyright the smaller artists would be even more boned than they are right now.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There should be real punishments for companies that do stuff like issue fraudulent DMCA takedowns.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That I can get behind!

Right now the law allows them to basically say, "oops, we kinda thought we owned that. Our bad." And walk away only to issue an identical takedown the next week.

I have a video series that gets a DMCA claim on the intro (that I made) every single time that I have to submit a counter claim. It's always overturned, but I have zero recourse to stop it from happening.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I know numerous small artists who use copyright to protect their work and get paid when people use their music in streams/videos, take down misuse of their graphic work, work with publishers to license their work, etc.

Copyright works fairly well for small creators.

Of course corporations abuse it like every other law. We don't say that home ownership should be abolished because landlords are shitty.

[–] osarusan@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

copyright law is never used by the small artists to protect their work

Tell me you're not an artist without telling me you're not an artist.

My friend, this is precisely the kind of thing I was alluding to in my previous post when I said "regurgitated by people who have clearly never created anything in their life." I promise you that as an artist I have used copyright law to protect my work, and so has just about every artist I know. I don't even know what you're imagining to make you say something so patently false.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)