this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
62 points (90.8% liked)

PC Gaming

12292 readers
555 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DW:

  1. You'll want a PCIe 3.0 NVME drive at minimum for an optimal gaming experience. Anything beyond PCIe 4.0 is excessive and is a poor use of your money.

  2. SATA SSDs are still viable but on the cusp of unplayable.

  3. And lastly no one should game on a HDD/harddrive as the performance is beyond abysmal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I wonder how the PC market compares to the PlayStation 5's speeds.

[–] zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think it's a chicken-or-egg dilemma for PC gaming. Game devs don't want to lose the big market of legacy hardwares, so core gamers can't maximize their top notch PC's potentials.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wonder how the new Ratchet and Clank runs on pcs.

[–] zhenbo_endle@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Good question. I found a comparison video by GamerInVoid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VODSVVkKRD4

According to their video, I think Ratchet and Clank is still playable on a PC with SATA SSD, but the waiting time when jumping between the worlds is definitely longer than NVMe

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)