this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
762 points (96.7% liked)

People Twitter

7827 readers
791 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhatThaFudge@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (15 children)

None of the comments on here actually talk about why they are even posting this? Did nobody see the Sydney Sweeney ad and the controversy??

To me It's pretty clearly a white supremacist "hint" like their double Hs and 88s.. It determines your eye color.. It's passed from the parents to the offspring.. they are not being subtle about it.

Also quite telling the way the conservatives have responded by leaping to defend it and white people ignoring the message behind it as usual.
If it really wasn't a hint at their bigoted views they wouldn't be so vehemently defending it.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Ok but why white supremest because she's white? I thought just a play on words or are genes only for white supremest now!

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I think we can agree that believing blonde hair and blue eyes are 'good genes' is a hitler-approved ideology. Whether this was meant in a malicious way in this ad is what's unclear here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)