Metadata embedded in the video and analyzed by WIRED and independent video forensics experts shows that rather than being a direct export from the prison’s surveillance system, the footage was modified, likely using the professional editing tool Adobe Premiere Pro. The file appears to have been assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ’s website, where it was presented as “raw” footage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

i think they said something about color grading to make it more clear etc. was there two sets of footage released and was this the supposedly raw one or is it just one video?

[–] ephemeral@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

they released two versions but the "enhanced" one was literally just brightened and sharpened, which is totally pointless and probably contains even less detail than the original because the highlights get blown out and the artifacts become exaggerated. I'm honestly surprised they didn't do some AI "enhancements" (which would have been even dumber of course)

but yeah it seems they're saying even the "raw" version was modified here

load more comments (2 replies)