Metadata embedded in the video and analyzed by WIRED and independent video forensics experts shows that rather than being a direct export from the prison’s surveillance system, the footage was modified, likely using the professional editing tool Adobe Premiere Pro. The file appears to have been assembled from at least two source clips, saved multiple times, exported, and then uploaded to the DOJ’s website, where it was presented as “raw” footage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] daniyeg@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

i think they said something about color grading to make it more clear etc. was there two sets of footage released and was this the supposedly raw one or is it just one video?

[–] VILenin@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

Who color grades shitty CCTV video? It’s not footage for a movies. I highly doubt the CCTV equipment in prisons are so unbelievably shitty that you need to process it to determine whether or not a person walks into the frame

load more comments (2 replies)