this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
646 points (96.1% liked)

memes

16174 readers
2574 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (12 children)

So what you're saying is that for each animal you eat, you save a lot of plants?

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (10 children)

No, for each animal you eat you're eating lots of plants in a really inefficient - and needlessly cruel - way

[–] psud@aussie.zone -1 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I cannot eat grass, ruminant animals can. How is it inefficient for me to eat the animal rather than the grass?

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because we use the land that could be used to grow enough food to feed many people to grow food for cows, which then feed fewer people. By buying into this system, you’re propagating inefficiency.

[–] psud@aussie.zone -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, we bulldoze forests to make fertile land available. I agree that's bad, I don't want celery from that land either

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

We’d need less land for crops generally if we were allotting it to human food instead of livestock feed.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)