this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

49373 readers
664 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago (8 children)

It is time for the fax machine to die.

It has been time for the fax Machine to die for the last 18 years.

For the love of God somebody, please kill the fax machine.

[–] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Need a simple end to end encrypted email solution, and for regular users to understand that solution isn't Gmail for fax to die. The health and financial sectors are keeping fax alive, and it isn't completely their fault.

[–] Link@rentadrunk.org 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Correct me if I’m wrong but fax isn’t end to end encrypted so how is it deemed more secure than email which also isn’t end to end encrypted (by default).

[–] projectmoon@forum.agnos.is 4 points 3 days ago

Probably a case of legislative inertia and tried-and-true practices. It's also a thing that's mostly limited to the US, I feel like. I want to say many other Western countries have digital systems in place (maybe not the BEST digital systems, but something better than fax).

Fax is not end-to-end encrypted. Not even sure it's encrypted in transit. But it is also something that doesn't rely on a third party provider storing all your data indefinitely and then losing it all in a data breach. Of course, that doesn't stop people from hooking up to a virtual fax service that might store info on a server... but still...

[–] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I suppose it has more to do with the opportunity for a significant breach. The healthcare provider's email system is a big target full of exploits. Fax is also ~~HIPPA~~HIPAA compliant, email is not.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Fax is also HIPPA compliant, email is not.

Yeah I just love having my cancer diagnosis sent in plaintext over copper wire such that anyone with a dollar store audio recorder and physical access to the wire can intercept. If there's one thing 19th century data transmission tech is known for, it's security and privacy.

Is it too much to ask that hospitals use the literally decades old AES standard for sending medical data?

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago
load more comments (5 replies)