this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
656 points (98.4% liked)

aww

24346 readers
508 users here now

A place with minimal rules for stuff that makes you go awww! Feel free to post pics, gifs, or videos of cats, dogs, babies, or anything cute and remember to be kind to others.

AI posts must be labeled [AI] in the title and are limited to one per week.

While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by instance-wide rules: https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (19 children)

I'm going to start ripping my own hair out of my fucking scalp. It's like every post I make now has an accusation of AI because of real world photography not always making 100% sense.

This is AI though right?

No

Not real kitties.

Real kitties.

The white and black blur in between the cats is clearly trying to be a tail but the color and placement are wrong.

Could also be a dog or another cat that's behind the two. That blur is on another stair and these two are much closer to the camera, can easily obscure something behind them.

The pile in the top right doesn’t make sense

It's blurry as hell. You have no idea what that is. You called it a 'pile'. That could also be flaking off concrete or vines. Saying that it "doesn't make sense" when you have so little information on what it is is not the immediate assumption you should be making. If you're dismissing things because of an assumption made on a lack of information then it's not helpful to anyone.

the stairs leading to a square door set at an angle from the stairs is wrong

Once again, perspective. This is at the bottom of a set of stairs looking up. You would not be able to see the landing at the top that would continue into that door. Moreover, pretty sure that door is a gate for the gap to the right of it. The white is the same as the railing.

and the building to the left of that makes no sense either.

You literally can't see it.

Plus the overly rich texture of the stairs

Jesus christ. Concrete just looks like that sometimes.

What I would really like is for people to bother going to look for an original source before making these accusations. You think an AI two years ago was able to make that image with no blatant errors in the cats themselves? Especially when no one else in the post is making that accusation? And especially when the same poster made another post of AI cats and it looked like this?

These accusations are exhausting. Firstly because they're just accusations with zero follow up. It took me 10 seconds to find the original post of that image. Why couldn't you have done that yourself? Secondly because it scares the hell out of me that things we've known about since the dawn of photography are being forgotten about en masse for the easy way of pointing and saying "AI."

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (12 children)

There will come a time when AI images are indistinguishable from the real thing. It's already possible with inanimate objects, but I haven't seen a convincing AI living thing yet.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Which is a problem to deal with when it arises. What exhausts me is having to say "No it isn't AI, it's real, you just forgot about basic photography. Also stop wasting my time with these accusations that will have people like a mob downvoting something and losing their mind when using tineye for 5 seconds would answer your question."

I had shit removed from @Pics@lemmy.world because the mod over there saw two accusations of an image being AI and removed it and refused blatant proof of it being a photo from it being from multiple angles with the same "errors". It's why I stopped posting there entirely and went to nocontextpics. When the mods are jumping on the bandwagon then it isn't a place I want to be associated with.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed, it's aggravating. It might be necessary to include (not AI) in the description or something since so many people seem to want to be AI detectives now.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hell no. I post 'Not OC' because one user decided to have a screaming meltdown about how I was misleading people by uploading stuff and not saying 'Not OC'. I'm already babysitting enough people on Lemmy. The 'Oh this is AI' people can deal with having their stupidity repeatedly called out to their face and deal with my frustration that they don't have enough brain cells to scoop together the ability to type tineye.com into the address bar.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

That's an option, too! I'd just want to try to head such comments off so I don't have to call them out.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)