this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
238 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

34971 readers
189 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] otter@lemmy.ca 149 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's a little ironic that they protect SOME copyright and artistic styles (from giant corporations producing media) but not other copyright and artistic styles (independent artists and creators)

So all the reasons they listed here, it's ok to do that to everyone else just not Disney ๐Ÿ˜’

Time to switch to the open source / self hosted / jailbroken creation tools instead

[โ€“] Chozo@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's not that ironic. In this case, the tool was creating a near-identical replication of the Disney logo. Generally, AI hasn't been able to convincingly reproduce a logo like that with any degree of reliability (for instance, the jumbled logos in the Getty Images situation). It looks like the AI has actually advanced to the point where it actually violates Disney's trademark. That crosses the line of fair use at that point.

[โ€“] tryptaminev@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find that differentiation fir a logo silly though.

copy pasting a logo on top after the ai generated the rest really isnt that difficult.

So how would Disney know reliably that the memes are indeed made with a violation by MS?

[โ€“] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't need to determine on an individual basis. It's simple enough to prove that the tool can do it, so they are enforcing that Microsoft make sure it can't.

[โ€“] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Photoshop can violate every trademark on the planet, Disney hasn't slapped Adobe for copyright theft.

[โ€“] null@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And Disney didn't slap Microsoft for copyright theft either.

And no, you can't ask Photoshop to generate the Disney logo. You'd have to do that yourself.

[โ€“] cm0002@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I noticed some of these posters had a much better Disney logo than the ones I was seeing before, there's been some horrible monstrosities lmao

[โ€“] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile the Shutterstock logo is all over sd

This is a trademark issue isn't it? Not a copyright.