this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
626 points (92.6% liked)

196

5151 readers
751 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Darrell_Winfield@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Following for the results of your work here so I can use it in the future.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

From this 2023 paper, looks like if all Nvidia AI servers are running 24/7, you'd get an energy consumption of about 5.7–8.9 TWh per year. Nvidia servers make up 95% of the AI market (according to the paper) so that'd be pretty close to what AI servers would consume.

The paper also estimates about 20% of crypto mining GPUs no longer mining etherium converted to AI, which contributed another 16.1 TWh per year.

This doesn't include some AI, but it should be the majority.

Between those two sources, that gives 23.4 TWh per year. That gives 0.08 exta joules per year per this converter. That's 22% of Sri Lanka's energy consumption (which is the lowest country).

So AI in a year uses at much energy as Sri Lanka uses in 3 months. At least in 2023. I'll see if I can find a more recent study.

[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's plenty of countries missing from that rankings list, and I bet those are the ones using less energy. Especially considering microstates like Vatican, the statement could be technically correct

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I can't find any info on Vatican City's energy use, but possibly. You could go even further and compare to not widly recognized countries like sealand, where you have the energy consumption of a residential house or two. But that would be wildly misleading.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)