this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
164 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

69156 readers
2913 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (17 children)

Yeah, it’s a solution in search of a problem.

Is it much cheaper than DRAM? Great! But until then, even if it’s lower power due to not needing the refresh, flash is just so cheap that it can scale up much better.

And I dunno what they mean by AI workloads. How would non volatility help at all, unless it’s starting to approach SRAM performance.

Some embedded stuff could use it, but that’s not a huge margin market.

Optane was sorta interesting because it was ostensibly cheaper and higher capacity than DRAM, albeit not enough.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Didn’t Intel do this with 3D cross point or something like that? Then it failed and was repurposed to optane, which also flopped?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Yes because ultimately, it just wasn't good enough.

That's what I was trying to argue below. Unified memory is great if it's dense and fast enough, but that's a massive if.

load more comments (15 replies)