this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
165 points (80.9% liked)

Canada

7161 readers
319 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Regions


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (21 children)

Re: the title... Yeah no, owners of an expensive property are not only not in the "rich" class, they're likely working class as much as gig drivers and cashiers. Unless they liquidate this asset and actually go live somewhere LCOL where they can live off of the labour of others, they're still working class.

[–] CanadaPlus 3 points 11 months ago (6 children)

If you're dicing things up that way, there's no middle class in the first place.

[–] satanicleftist@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There never has been. You either sell your body and labour, or own enough capital for it to self sustain, or at least be sustained by the labour class.

[–] CanadaPlus 3 points 11 months ago

If we're doing Marx, don't forget the petite bourgeoisie, who draw significant income from both. They were minor in Marx's day, partly because very little was publicly traded, but they're actually the wealthiest group by far now, taken as a whole.

[–] Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Exactly, you're either a part of the working class or capitalist class

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)