this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
683 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] asap@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (15 children)

It's a very, very different approach having everything as a bullet point though.

[–] artificialfish@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Yeah but you learn it and it’s a far more organized approach

[–] Virkkunen@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter if it's a "far more organised approach", logseq simply doesn't fit many types of workflows for note taking.

logseq is a zettelkasten program; Obsidian is a text editor

[–] artificialfish@programming.dev 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Embrace zettelkasten as your note taking workflow. It’s more organized 😅

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

I prefer PARA, which I implement some ideas of Zettelkasten into. Logseq sadly couldn't do this well. It also just sadly lacks a lot of plugins and features I need/really want. Logseq is great, but so is Obsidian.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)