chapotraphouse

13920 readers

806 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

context@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

162

"Women = icky = no money" NSF (hexbear.net)

submitted 5 months ago by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://xcancel.com/darbysaxbe/status/1886584910967922973

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] crime@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago (6 children)

This is for funding grant proposals, so they wouldn't be retracting anything. Doesn't look like they're looking at context at all, based on the flowchart, a proposal with a title like "Effects of colloidal silver on female Cannabis plants" would get rejected in the first step.

[–] grendahlgrendahlgen@hexbear.net 7 points 5 months ago (5 children)

But the flowchart says "keywords and context" at each of the steps. That's what I'm referring to.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But the flowchart says "keywords and context" at each of the steps.

Let's be honest, they'll half ass this and end up denying a multitude of stuff

[–] grendahlgrendahlgen@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

Oh I totally agree, they don't give a shit about "context", just pointing out their little fig leaf.

load more comments (3 replies)