this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
1661 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

20188 readers
935 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I am not familiar with MacOS, but that seems like a nightmare. What is the purpose of these files?

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Iirc they're indexes for the system wide search feature, Spotlight

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is there a valid reason not to store that [[anywhere else]], ideally in Spotlight's data?

[–] FearfulSalad@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe. There are many ways to move files and directories around without using Finder, at which point all indexed data about those files and directories will be stale. Forcing something as core as mv to update Spotlight would be significantly worse, I think. By keeping the .DS_Store files co-located with the directory they index, moving a directory does not invalidate the index data (though moving a file without using Finder still does). Whether retaining indexing on directory moves is a compelling enough reason to force the files everywhere is probably dependent on whether that's a common enough pattern among workflows of users, and whether spotlight performance would suffer drastically if it were reliant on a central store not resilient against such moves.

So, it's probably a shaky reason at best.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)