this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
736 points (98.4% liked)

196

17034 readers
595 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

oh, then i am very sorri. i as genuinely not aware and assumed that it was an old-timey word. i apologize.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Even if it were an old timey word what's the issue?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It implies a sex change op which is quite invasive of people's privacy. It's also inaccurate for a lot of trans folks who may only change their gender expression and avoid the operation altogether, hence the adoption of transgender that has the right emphasis.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not what I asked, but understood

[–] Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

It seems quite literally what you asked? If not then you should rephrase.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

What's the issue?
It has the wrong implications.

Sorry, I wasn't clear!

~It~ ~also~ ~sounds~ ~lewd~ ~but~ ~there's~ ~a~ ~similar~ ~debate~ ~about~ ~"queer"~ ~even~ ~though~ ~that~ ~one~ ~has~ ~been~ ~mostly~ ~reclaimed.~

[–] Dragonborn3810@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Not op, but I was taught by one of my trans friends it was an old term and not very correct nowadays as it inferred being trans was something sexual and not just yknow, bring trans ig