this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
639 points (81.7% liked)

memes

10918 readers
3342 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 day ago (35 children)

Tiktok got banned not for peddling "chinese propaganda" but instead not peddling the US one.

All the major tech companies in the US take measures to ensure content deemed unworthy by the government never become mainstream or viral.

This is done under the pretense of stopping "hate speech" or "terroristic propaganda" but often include things like pro-palestinian content or class struggle content (like luigi mangione stuff).

Tiktok was bold enough to not do that by default, cuz they wanted someone to ask them to do this and then it would become a huge scandal about how the US suppresses free speech. And US gov don't want to do that for this exact reason as well. So they decided to ban it.

Remember talks for this "law" were initiated when all of a sudden tiktok became a host for pro-palestinian voices. We should ask ourselves, how is it that 60% of americans want the government to stop arms sales to israel but this 60% never shows up on the big social media platforms. But on other platforms like here in lemmy and tiktok, pro-palestinians is the majority.

For further reading, listen to employees fired from big US tech companies for voicing their concerns over the palestine issue, or read Meta's new terms and conditions specially the section on "dangerous organizations and individuals".

[–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (7 children)

They track the location of people in the US and gather large amounts of data. They didn't get banned for refusing to spread US propaganda.

[–] just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

These are very loose terms. Pretty much every major website saves IP addresses when you create an account (to prevent abuse/spam detection). And you can get location info from the IP address. Hence the first condition would be true for all of those websites.

Next, any website/app that builds a recommendation system will save user interactions to build the "algorithm". So every social media with an algorithm will fall into this category.

With enough bending of terminology, we might be able to prove that the lemmy also collects user data (although it will be really hard cuz the algo here is based on upvotes and time posted iirc). And "large amount" part is just legal filler words.

[–] anas@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not to defend tiktok (to this day I have not ever used it), but if the issue is the tracking and data collection, you could ban/regulate that specifically instead of singling out the app.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

It is obvious that they want the other (US-based) companies to be able to continue collecting that data so they can gain access to it if they want/need it. It's bullshit, but it's clearly what they want.

But that being bullshit does not mean that they are wrong in not wanting the one that is under the control of a foreign adversary having access to that data. Two separate things.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

And the US social media companies are filled with spooks.

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Ding ding ding

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 10 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

False dichotomy. They could’ve been banned on legitimate pretenses AND other reasons threatening power.

If they were legitimately only banned for “tracking the location in the US and gathering large amounts of data”, then just about every single social media service would be under investigation for the same reason. But do we currently see that happening?

[–] ConnecticutKen@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

They're owned by a Chinese company so the Chinese govt has this information. I'm not saying it's a good reason to ban it, or that there isn't another secret reason, or that American companies don't gather the same information. This was the problem all along - China receiving vast amounts of information about Americans. Actually the US was probably worried about China spreading their viewpoints, now that I think more about it. IDK

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

If they were legitimately only banned for “tracking the location in the US and gathering large amounts of data”, then just about every single social media service would be under investigation for the same reason.

We aren't talking about TikTok simply gathering the information though, are we?

But yes, absolutely. Let's do it. And we know that: just because the other companies aren't being investigated/regulated in the same way, does not mean that it shouldn't happen at all. That's not how it works.

Also, you are making a fallacious argument yourself... If we were talking about banning US social media sites in China, then the comparison holds (and even then, it's not 1:1 given the political structure of the CCP vs. that of the US). Otherwise, TikTok is clearly unique among them in that the Chinese Government ostensibly has access to any and all information that is being collected.

There is a reason China made their own version Facebook. Because they don't want us to have all that information on their citizens.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 21 hours ago

Of all the social media popular in the US, only one of them is doing that tracking and is under the thumb of a foreign adversary. That is specifically the line drawn in the law. I'm actually curious if WeChat shouldn't fall under it too?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

So does facebook, twitter, google, microsoft, and pretty much every mobile app development shop.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago

As does all the American owned networks. That’s not the reason. Not pushing American propaganda is the reason.

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 22 hours ago

hankie hugger, yall ain’t gonna win this one

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s what they’re telling you, and since when are they telling the truth?

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think aliens did it.

load more comments (27 replies)