this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
1449 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

We know it's ad-free and zero cost, but will it be DRM-free as well?

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if US government IP is legally allowed to be DRM'd.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

Not only is it not allowed to be DRM'd, "US government IP" is itself an oxymoron: stuff published by the government is Public Domain, so it doesn't even count as "intellectual property [sic]" to begin with.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, it’s paid for by taxpayers, so it’s all fair use.

[–] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Edit: I realize from the replies that my point was off base and actually opposite of the debate here. I'm going to leave this in its place, but thanks to the responders that showed me this wasn't the right place to make the point I was trying to.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Govt research grants are not videos literally being published by the govt. They aren't particularly comparable siuations. It's why I can't just buy a stock of Disney and suddenly have free access to their IP. Meanwhile I can rehost whole programs put out by NASA with zero issue.

I get the anger and it's justified, but man is it misdirected here.

[–] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you. I agree and I've updated my comment. 🙂

Yes, thank you. You gave a more detailed answer than I did.

No, I was specifically talking about their media content. Pictures, videos, etc.

[–] cjf@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This would only be true in the US. What about the rest of the world?

[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

In this case, free in the rest of the world as well.

They could geo-lock it if they wanted, but that's not the road NASA likes to take in general.

Good question. I think as long as you can already access the NASA app, NASA TV (it’s on YouTube, too), and NASA’s websites, then this should be no different. IIRC one press release said they wanted to share their content “with the world”, so it sounds like that’s a yes, but again I’m not 100% sure. Hopefully we find out in a few days :)

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most NASA stuff is published under non affiliation free use license - you can do what ever you like with it.

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

you can do what ever you like with it.

RIP to the videos on Uranus.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't be surprised if a majority of the content is already freely downloadable from somewhere...