this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
979 points (93.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12953 readers
2060 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 10 points 3 days ago (33 children)

I'm sure this sounded convincing in your head.

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (31 children)

It's the entire argument in a nutshell yes. A common-sense response to those desires is what separates the countries that don't have much gun crime from yours.

[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (10 children)

There are all kinds of discussions we can have about this, not the least of which is that “no guns” simply isn’t an option in a country with 500 million firearms and no central firearm registry.

But, really, all that stuff is beside the point. Guns are the ultimate equalizer. They equalize the weak and the strong. An 80 year old grandma can defend herself against a 25 year old man using a gun. A suppressed populace can defend themselves against a tyrannical government using guns.

Gun crime has negligible impact on most Americans; we have about half as many firearm homicides as traffic deaths annually.

Philosophically, the gun community feels having that equalizer and balance against tyranny is more important than the impacts of gun crime. Whether or not more gun control will decrease gun crime is irrelevant if a person feels that free firearm access is the more important of the two issues.

Btw, regardless of your views, if you come to the US you should shoot some guns. It’s fun and you’ll be glad you did.

[–] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

preach! This! couldn't have said it better myself.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)