UK Politics

3142 readers

103 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Prioritise people’s needs ‘over newts’ in housing policy, says Angela Rayner (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by frankPodmore@slrpnk.net to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The government plans to unveil sweeping changes this week to the national planning policy framework, the document which sets out national priorities for building, after a consultation.

I'm really looking forward to the yimby charter, I've got to say. We're going to build so much stuff, it's going to be amazing.

'Labour seem to be saying that Angela is best and local people can be ignored.'

I endorse this message.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So they’re moving the newts and still building? That seems ok, as long as it’s done properly.

[–] GreyShuck@feddit.uk 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sadly, translocation has a very low success rate. It lets the developers say that they've been good, but if you return to check 5 years down the line chances are the reception site will be in a very poor condition and the tranlocated population much reduced or gone altogether.

If we are on a position where Labour are saying that the tories protected wildlife too much, my hopes for wildlife are not high.

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 8 points 2 weeks ago

Ok. I take it all back then. To be fair the idea that the Tories would protect anything but themselves or money is bonkers.