this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
231 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

59641 readers
2671 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dupree878@lemmy.world 36 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

So block the article in India but there’s no reason to block it in the rest of the world. Fuck India’s government gonna do to them?

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

We were blocked in Turkey for 3 years or so, and fought all the way to the Supreme Court and won. Nothing has changed about our principles. The difference in this case is that the short term legal requirements in order to not wreck the long term chance of victory made this a necessary step.

Hopefully not block the entire website in India.

[–] LorIps@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why? VPNs exist and fuck Modi

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Not everyone knows of/has access to VPN's.

I don't disagree with your sentiment, but I also get why they'd rather try to resolve it legally. If they succeed it will allow for much easier access for the majority of visitors.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They'll learn quickly. The Arab Spring bore that out.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And where are those Arab countries now?

Reading Wikipedia

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)