this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

31393 readers
269 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Up to > 100 GB files
  • End-to-end encrypted file transfer
  • Parallel upload
  • One-time download link
  • 7 day retention period (Download link expires and files are being deleted afterwards.)
  • Files are stored in Switzerland
  • OpenSource, no account needed
  • Free (a Donations will be nice)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xoggy@programming.dev 5 points 5 days ago (7 children)

Someone should make a service like this except you actually upload the file directly to the other user rather than uploading it to a 3rd party (encrypted or not). Yes I get you would have to wait for the user on the other end to connect to you before the transfer starts but if you're uploading 100+GB of data you're going to be leaving that browser tab open for awhile anyways.

[–] anguo@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Doesn't magic wormhole do that? I remember there used to be a few websites providing a web interface for it, but I can't seem to find them anymore.

[–] precarious_primes@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Yes, there are relays to connect the clients together and then the transfer is direct.

Several years ago when I was doing consulting I had lots of clients that blocked all the normal file sharing domains to prevent people from getting files into servers but magic wormhole always worked for me. I'd stash a wormhole-william (magic wormhole compatible Go application) executable in our installer deliverable and then I could update the software without IT's help in the future (I often had RDP access). The headaches saved by cutting red tape were worth the risk for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)