this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1086 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59597 readers
2854 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta given 30 days to cease using the name Threads by company that trademarked it 11 years ago::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 89 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

It is too bad Meta couldn't afford a lawyer to do a search for trademarks and copyrights. Really shame.

[–] Resolute3542@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Did you even read the article??

It appears that Meta was aware of Threads before launching its platform of the same name. Company lawyers made four offers to purchase the domain 'threads.app' from Threads Software Ltd from April 2023, all of which were declined. Meta announced Threads in July 2023, the same time that the British company says it was removed from Facebook.

They literally made an offer to buy the domain Threads.app 4 times and got rejected.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 20 points 1 year ago

It was sarcasm. Meta has lots of money.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then figured they'd be fine if they deleted their Facebook account. If your Facebook account gets deleted you get deleted in real life, after all.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 year ago

TIL Facebook follows Wes Craven rules

load more comments (3 replies)