this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
1066 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2434 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Historians suggest Democrats might have fared better against Donald Trump by embracing the economic issues championed by Senator Bernie Sanders, who has long pushed for a focus on “bread-and-butter” concerns for working-class voters.

Despite Kamala Harris’s progressive policies, polls showed Trump was favored on economic issues, particularly among working-class and Hispanic voters.

Historian Leah Wright Rigueur argued that Sanders’ messaging on economic struggles could be key for future Democratic strategies.

Sanders himself criticized the party for “abandoning” the working class, which he said has led to a loss of support across racial lines.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I mean, why would the DNC give he left the time of day?

Passed biggest climate bill, forgave most student loans in history, rescheduled weed, etc. And yet? It's never good enough nor enough to give them a chance to do more.

All with a threadbare Senate majority with two "independent" dems and only two years of a house majority.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

rescheduled weed

They did not reschedule weed. It's still Schedule I. Crime Bill Biden ran out the clock like he always intended to.

EDIT: Downvoting it doesn't magically pull cannabis out of Schedule I.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They literally didn't, I don't know why you're being downvoted.

...I mean I know why, but its wild.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Centrists see that Trump has a cult of morons who will believe any lie they're told, and get mad at anyone who demonstrates that they don't have that too.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's why they courted Republicans, they wanted that same "they'll do anything we say" energy.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And worse, they assumed they already had it and were fiercely hostile to anyone who pointed out that they didn't.