this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
89 points (94.9% liked)

UK Politics

3051 readers
246 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (14 children)

The question is whether this is all there is.

He originally applied for a student visa. If a judge takes this at face value and is approved, every asylum seeker will take a picture with rainbows to get approved. The judge did comment on posturing and I think is just asking "have you ever been in a same sex relationship?". It could be that there is zero evidence of a relationship.

Being gay isn't wearing rainbows, it's being attracted to someone of the same sex.

Asylum cases are a little more challenging and do need more proof than other situations.

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

“A major part of this involves giving oral testimony to a Home Office official. Inspectors in 2013 found that one in 10 interviewers would ask LGBTQ+ asylum seekers ‘intrusive questions’ such as: ‘Did you put your penis into X’s backside?’ and ‘Did X ejaculate inside you?’“

Bruh imagine getting deported for being a Virgin, you don’t carry enough homosexual proof like wtf, like what are you even saying ? He should be gayer? Like wtf, he should be promiscuous would that “validate” him?

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

imagine getting deported for being a Virgin,

That, as well as aro/ace being a thing, but also - imagine living someplace where being in the relationship you want to be in is not only illegal but potentially punishable by death, so you don't risk it, or if you do, definitely don't document it, and when you finally escape somewhere you think is safe, they tell you you don't deserve protection because you have no proof of past relationships.

And don't even start on the fact that much of the rampant homophobia around the world was institutionalised there by the same nations now looking for any way to turn those trying to desperately escape it, away.

Colonise the world, pillage and hoard all of the wealth and resources, then pull up the ladder and kick off anyone trying to escape the pit you put them in and whine about how they're the ones trying to take over. It's obscene.

[–] Naryn@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That, as well as aro/ace being a thing

If you're aro /ace why exactly are you claiming asylum based on sexuality

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Because gay aro/ace people exist, jfc (not to mention that a. being aro/ace doesn't mean you never have any sex or relationship, but more importantly b. whatever orientation, aro/ace people are still marginalised and violently oppressed all over the world, just like the rest of the LGBTQIA+ community. It's why it fucking include us)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)