this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
89 points (94.9% liked)

UK Politics

3051 readers
246 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I don’t know anything about situation but damn they really found the umm most flamboyants pictures of him.

[–] IcyToes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (14 children)

The question is whether this is all there is.

He originally applied for a student visa. If a judge takes this at face value and is approved, every asylum seeker will take a picture with rainbows to get approved. The judge did comment on posturing and I think is just asking "have you ever been in a same sex relationship?". It could be that there is zero evidence of a relationship.

Being gay isn't wearing rainbows, it's being attracted to someone of the same sex.

Asylum cases are a little more challenging and do need more proof than other situations.

[–] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 17 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

“A major part of this involves giving oral testimony to a Home Office official. Inspectors in 2013 found that one in 10 interviewers would ask LGBTQ+ asylum seekers ‘intrusive questions’ such as: ‘Did you put your penis into X’s backside?’ and ‘Did X ejaculate inside you?’“

Bruh imagine getting deported for being a Virgin, you don’t carry enough homosexual proof like wtf, like what are you even saying ? He should be gayer? Like wtf, he should be promiscuous would that “validate” him?

[–] Naryn@lemmy.world -3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Bruh imagine getting deported for being a Virgin

If you've never had sex and never had a partner then why exactly are you claiming asylum for your sexuality.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago

Do you think gay people have to have sex to be discriminated against?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)