this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
354 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3053 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randombullet@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nah I don't believe you at all.

SAMSUNG 870 QVO SATA 8TB = $683.38 x 4 = $2,733.52

8TB x 4 = 32TB

$2,733.52 / 32TB = $85.4225/TB

Yeah one of these disks does not cost more than $25/TB.

26TB x $25 = $650

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

FWIW in July last year Amazon was selling these as low as $320. My biggest fear of a 26 TB HDD is getting all 26 TB of data off of it if I needed it without the drive dying.

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As long as you follow the 3-2-1 rule, you don't need to worry about putting your eggs in one basket.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That’s true but more concerned with rebuilding the raid than necessarily losing the data. I have to admit that I’m lazy with backups and I’ve had my ass saved by RAID 6.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

It's really difficult/expensive for a home user to do a 3-2-1 backup properly. Especially if you're pushing beyond a few TB.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 month ago

QVO drives are trash though. Would not recommend. Very slow and they don't last as long as Samsung's EVO and PRO drives.