this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
82 points (94.6% liked)

World News

38831 readers
2599 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Researchers have used commercial satellite imagery to identify more than 30 points where Iranian missiles appear to have impacted an air base in southern Israel.

Based on preliminary calculations of what happened at Nevatim, Lewis believes a substantial number of Iranian missiles may have reached their targets.

Lewis notes that although over 30 missiles landed inside the base perimeter, the damage caused was still somewhat limited. That's notable because Iran is believed to have used some of its most advanced Fattah missiles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago (10 children)

So it seems Iran overstated the accuracy of their missiles and Israel understated how many got through.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't think Iran was really targeting that precisely. Like last time, this is mostly just to do something in response. If they actually wanted to cause damage, they'd probably be more precise in their strikes.

Appear weak when you are strong, and all that. No point in letting the enemy know how good your missiles can be if you don't have to.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dunno, I feel like displaying how accurate your missiles are is a better deterrent

[–] PlasticLove@lemmy.today -2 points 1 week ago

I dunno, I feel like lulling an enemy whose frothing at the mouth to attack you into believing your missiles aren’t a real threat is a good strategy to get them to underestimate you at their peril.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)