this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
643 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn't this t the manager's fault that those shitty developers are there as well though?

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In theory a decent QA team will catch things being done by shitty developers. If your dev and QA is shit, management is shit for letting it happen.

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man I wish we had QAs still at my Mega Corp. They removed the role and saddled development with that responsibility (along with getting rid our our business analysts and putting that also on the engineer's responsibility list).

[–] hypnicjerk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

if they expect you to do a consultant's work, they should pay you a consultant rate

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Kind of but it's not fair to put it all on the manager. Multiple people decided to hire the person. Somebody else approved that code review. People approved the technical design. Why didn't the tech lead raise concerns with the manager about someone's under-performance, etc. it's unfair to just put all blame on the manager.

The idea of extreme ownership is about not saying "not my problem I won't do anything" or blaming your reports. It's about saying I can and should do anything and everything in my ability to fix problems.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe over an extended period of time, but that's not something people get fired for right away. Also bugs are a fact of life in software, and while some developers may ship more bugs than others, work still needs to get done, and it's often better to try and train and improve an existing employee than fire them too soon.