this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
30 points (75.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8400 readers
516 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

!deadlock@sopuli.xyz

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 107 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Dunn acknowledges that he could have found the same answer with the right Google search terms, but says that the point is that he didn't have to: ChatGPT immediately returned what he was looking for even though he described it vaguely.

I remember when google used to return the right results even when the search was vague.

[–] thann@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Its so stupid, google "bipartie matching algorithm" and the second result is a stack overflow where the second answer is the Hungarian algorithm....

So every programmer would have found that immediately using the traditional methodology....

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yup, AI is frequently a worse way to do something we used to do, but with a crappy pretend to be a person responding veneer.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not what I got. In fact, stack overflow isn't in any of my results. I got a lot of scholarly articles for various algorithms and none of them mention the Hungarian algorithm.

load more comments (3 replies)