this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
144 points (96.2% liked)

World News

32348 readers
413 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] neglector0669@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

While I'm openly in favor of supporting Ukraine, it's important to note that the vast majority of this type of military aid is provided in kind.

So really, it's a proposal to give US Defense contractors $100b+ to replenish and restock the DOD with new kit and munitions for the old kit and munitions that we're providing to Ukraine. Which then get into the use accounting tricks e.g. depreciation values, etc.

The annual military aid to Israel is a little different, it's more like a loss leader coupon: give Israel money that they have to spend with US Defense contractors, which then also incentivizes them spending their own budget on complementary systems that can be integrated with those systems, munitions, support contracts, etc.

Although in this case, I believe it's primarily munitions and other kit that the DOD already has in warehouses.

This is oversimplified, but I just see these headline figures always being confused for pallets of cash.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

While I'm openly in favor of supporting Ukraine

How about Palestine?

[–] neglector0669@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do I support giving arms to Israel? No, but that wasn't the point of my post. It was an very high level explainer to head off the inevitable portrayal of this as a direct cash transfer.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you you seriously just describe your own comment as "very high level"?

[–] neglector0669@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did you really confuse that for meaning "expert" and not "incredibly basic and way oversimplified"?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)