this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
119 points (96.9% liked)

World News

32348 readers
520 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I listened to an interview recently, I believe on BBC, where the interviewee said the biggest issue with peace talks is that the international community isn't able to trust Putin to keep his word on whatever is agreed upon. I hadn't considered that, but it makes a lot of sense and I'm not sure how that could change

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 2 months ago

But Putin was they only party to the previous Minsk agreements who kept his word. Merkel and then Hollande admitted that they never had any intention of honoring the agreements.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 months ago

The international community being G7 countries accounting for 15% of world population. Nobody gives a fuck what the west thinks at this point.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 10 points 2 months ago

Russia won't be trustworthy until Putin and his fascist United Russia party are gone.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

Who was the interviewee?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

it makes a lot of sense and I'm not sure how that could change

It will change when the cancer finally kills that bastard.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The same argument can be used in favor of Russia. NATO has invaded plenty of countries under false pretenses in the past. Both Russia and NATO do not have a reputation for keeping their promises.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Unironically yes, NATO members have invaded a lot of places, often in coalition with other member states.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's like saying Canada is responsible for something Mexico did because they're both on the same continent...

NATO is purely a defense agreement.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It is more like saying the axis is known to invade nations because its member states invade nations. Okay, sure, Germany and Italy invaded the soviet union but Japan didn't, you can't say they're not a defensive alliance /s

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 months ago

You draw new borders and stop shooting, that's a start. You then keep the agreement by having enough military for a new invasion to be undesirable. Simple game theory. Trust and promises only work for societies that mutually respect each other.