this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
153 points (94.7% liked)

World News

32348 readers
477 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The final figure will be significantly higher. Asked if the figure was likely to exceed €10 billion, he said: “Yes, we are talking about such magnitude.”

You can't take money with you, but we will leave an atmosphere behind

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Ngl, this is 100% the sort of project that the EU should support in its member nations

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Why?

Renewables are cheaper, faster to deliver and better over all for the environment. There's every reason to believe this will just be a money sink that may not even see the light of day eventually.

[–] crt0o@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Why do you think renewables are better for the environment? Nuclear is very clean and produces next to no emissions. In comparison, solar panels have a production process which produces considerable emissions, once they fail (which is in around 25 - 30 yrs), they basically turn into toxic waste. Similar goes for wind turbines, but they also totally ruin the landscape, since roads have to be built in order to access and maintain them. Additionally they're not viable everywhere and look ugly af.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)