this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
1006 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2510 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nifty@lemmy.world 54 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Bernie/AOC ticket 2024 plz

Or 2028 if we still have elections then

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I love Bernie, but he’s 82 and has heart disease.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Trump is mentally challenged and he’s still running

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Would be easily the biggest age gap between president and vice president

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 32 points 4 months ago (2 children)

AOC for president, Bernie for vice (cause ageist societal concerns).

Or, Bernie as President, AOC as Prime Minister (using SCOTUS' ruling to rewrite all laws and current established government).

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago

Fucking Brilliant. Biden could just pull out the ol' uno reverse right now.

[–] force@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Why would we have a PM? We already have the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader. And the PM wouldn't be able to exercise any executive powers unless you burned the constitution, because separation of powers.

There's not really a good reason to adopt a parliamentary system like the UK's for example if we were to completely reform the government imo. Or to have a PM separate from the president at all.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago (3 children)

My god can we get a younger social Democrat please? Fuckin A I'm tired of people born before WW2 ended making all the policy decisions. I was going to say before the moon landing but they were all adults when that happened. They're not even Boomers. They're fucking older than boomers.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

Bernie will be 87 in 2028.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Is there anyone younger with stances like Bernie?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Katie Porter & AOC would be amazing

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If those two ran on a presidential ticket together, the Republican Party would dial up the “it’ll be the end times if they win and only our lord and savior Trump can stop it” to 1000.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Other than the actual real world insanity, I'd love to see them pop some blood vessels.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Talib, AOC? Cori Bush?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most of America. But they aren't becoming politicians. Mostly because politicians are really bad people for the most part. You get maybe 5 percent that don't have ulterior motives.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

5 percent is awfully generous. Maybe it's that high for people that try to run, but the vast majority of people that win are sucking someone's teet.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Who cares how old they are as long as they have the right positions on the issues and a sound mind? I love having people with some wisdom in there.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

The problem is apparently having someone in office that will live long enough to actually reap what they sow. I didn't used to think this would ever be a thing we'd have to be worried about, but, here we are. Environmental issues in particular hit this note I think.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You've never seen what dementia can do to a person. Or, just the general confusion that comes with age. I'm happy for you, honestly it sucks to watch. Someone who used to know everything suddenly gets confused on the way to a restaurant they've been to a thousand times. Forgets why they called, or even that they called you in the first place. And, importantly, have their opinions flip on a dime with no warning whatsoever.

This isn't necessarily dementia, it can be caused by any number of things, ailments that younger people would brush off without a thought.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

This isn't necessarily dementia

It's almost certainly not dementia. He's definitely in mental decline, and that is more than sufficient to explain what we've seen.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Idk. I feel like Jay Pritzker/Warren 2028 would be fucking sweet

[–] GooseFinger@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Nah, I'd take a turd sandwich over Pritzker any day.