this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
1006 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2559 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Is she viable with our current first-past-the-post system? No? Then she's not a realistic choice. All she can do is pull votes from Democrats handing the election to Trump.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is she viable with our current first-past-the-post system

viability is a myth invented by the media. hilary was viable. john kerry.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago

Did you read beyond that word? I'm not applying a political yardstick to her, I'm using the term in the sense that she literally cannot win.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Its a weird self fulfilling prophecy thing. Its entirely up to vote whether or not she wins, but people wont vote for her only because they dont think she'll win.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I won't vote for her because she's a traitor pushing Russian interests, just like trump.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

anything besides her consistent calls for less US military interventions? The green party is a lot less military focused than republicans and democrats

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That traitor pushes Putin's propaganda on Ukraine. That's enough for me to know she is pro-oligarchy and anti-democracy.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Unless that propaganda is something other than "the US should have less military presence in other countries", then this is just...the platform of an actually progressive party that has always called for being less of a militaristic nation. You'll see her calling for the US to stop aiding Israel in its genocide as well.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I feel like you still aren't getting it. It's not these reasons, it's because we have a 2-Party system. I don't like it, and we desperately need election reform, but until then, no one can win without being the Republican/Democrat Nominee. Bernie Sanders, Jon Stewart, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, not one of them could win as a 3rd-Party candidate...

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don’t like it, and we desperately need election reform

these words are hollow in the face of actions actively perpetuating the 2 party system. Im looking enviously at Peter Magyar in Hungary forming a party in March and now being elected to EU parliament because people wanted an alternative after a corruption scandal. This shit aint enough for you?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Some real "Curious... You criticize society, yet you participate in it" vibes here. "Perpetuate" the 2-party system!? What are you actually talking about? People should not vote, or throw it away until they magically give us ranked choice voting?? Absolute nonsense.

If you want to walk the walk, start a grass roots effort to reform the system, and I'll support you. Until then, I'll assume you're just trying to get people to not use our only real power currently: voting.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Im talking about voting for ranked choice. Thats just it, we arent going to magically get it by doing nothing, it happens when we say so.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago

All she can do is pull votes from Democrats handing the election to Trump.

the ambiguity of this syntax is fun! the democrats are handing the election to trump, and jill stein is trying to pull votes from them!