this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
568 points (96.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
527 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
568
I’ve got a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty baby, and I’ll write your name: Just Stop Oil paint private jets hours after Taylor Swift’s lands (juststopoil.org)
submitted 5 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
188 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

What's the point of destroying Stonehenge if humanity survives as a cascading result of stopping air travel? Defacing or destroying Stonehenge is not the lynch pin that solves or even moves the needle on climate change.

Worse, if it WORKS it means the next cause that is perhaps not existential is going to come and destroy something else that belongs to humanity. Weirdly, when nation states destroy heritage sites it's considered a type of war crime, but when it comes up for raising awareness for climate change fuck yeah everyone's in!

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

No one destroyed Stonehenge. They covered it in ~~wheat-based~~ cornstarch-based dye that washes off in the rain (something England gets a lot of). Calm your tits.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Last time it was cornstarch.

And the stones are covered in lichen that protect the stone

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

While you are correct (and while I said destroy OR deface), the two different posts about this both contain people advocating for actual destruction for the same reasons.

Please read the other posts and alarm your tits to the reality / tenor of the discussion.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay "alarm your tits" is a genuinely funny turn of phrase.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

I laughed when I wrote it.