this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
568 points (96.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
547 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
568
I’ve got a fossil fuel non-proliferation treaty baby, and I’ll write your name: Just Stop Oil paint private jets hours after Taylor Swift’s lands (juststopoil.org)
submitted 5 months ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
188 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think that's kinda the commenters point. Morons almost have a chance of connecting a few dots when it's private jets. Half a step removed, and nope, morons won't even attempt understanding

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think the point is to ragebait people into reading about it.

An educational campaign doesn't work.

People get angry when the protests disrupt their day.

Peaceful protests happen literally everyday in the US in nearly every city and hear nothing about them.

The only way it gets visibility is it has to be disruptive, and the only way to get them to read/learn about it is to hook them in. And if Faux News has taught anyone anything, it's that ragebaiting is fucking effective.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

anyone that thinks people will say 'oh these guys are doing something I feel is stupid, I better learn what they have to say' has never met a single human in their life.

[–] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That's funny, you realize not everyone will jump to the conclusion it was 'stupid' right away? Most will say, "they did what? Why?" Aka curiosity. We learn more. We understand. Then we decide if it's stupid or not.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Yet that's pretty much exactly what I did.