this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
147 points (89.7% liked)

Technology

59597 readers
3322 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dozens join lawsuit alleging Apple AirTags are stalkers’ “weapon of choice.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

Why blame Apple for this?

Would you sue Ford for making a windowless van that makes it so easy to transport kidnapped children?

When you configure the AirTag, there is an alert which explicitly states that using these to stalk people is illegal. If someone does try to smuggle one into you and you have any smartphone, it will let you know you’re being stalked.

I know how much this community looooves to shit on Apple, but this case is completely asinine.

[–] Lemmitor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If the court certified a class of people alleging a claim against Apple based on damages incurred as a result of the AirTag products, the case, at the very least, deserves to be heard on its merits.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable that something like this would go to trial. The questions of what statutes, if any, has Apple violated and what liability Apple should hold deserve to be answered in a court of equity.

Now whether the final ruling will be fair and just depends on your view of our system of civil courts and the doctrine of stare decisis.

Think of it this way; if the court agrees with you, then there is precedent set that implies corporations may not have liability under a set of circumstances similar to the ones described in this article. There are broader implications of the question that go beyond Apple.

load more comments (19 replies)