521
Microsoft to test “new features and more” for aging, stubbornly popular Windows 10
(arstechnica.com)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
I'll just jump ship completely and use my Linux install 100% of the time. If I need to use a more mainstream OS for some stupid reason I'll just use my Mac.
Only reason I need Windows is for Flight Simulator. If it weren’t for that I’d be on Linux for sure.
Linux is still not there for gaming, that's what holds back most of the people who bitch about windows. People who just use windows to browse and do spreadsheets they don't care.
Gaming is absolutely there, if you want to say something about anti cheat and whatnot that's fair, but my gamescope enabled, AMD fsr utilizing arch install is performance parity to Windows 10, if not more performant. I'm not giving up that performance gain for an insanely small handful of games. You do you I guess.
My VR library is only half on linux or less and 1 of my streaming QoL apps is not even in the list. After 4 days (non consecutive over a month or so), and several steam updates, I finally got room setup to run and installed a few VR games last weekend, now steam overlay would not load to start a game. I want to switch to linux fully, I have for 2 decades. It is getting there, but still many miles to go.
Even for AC, most AC is supported. Battle Eye and Easy Anti-cheat both work fine (with the proton patches that should be automatically installed). Maybe there's some custom AC that doesn't work, but I haven't found it yet. I'd guess Riot's doesn't if you want to play Valorant or LoL and want to install their root kit. I've had issues with The Finals (who just took a long time to update EAC but works fine now) and Squad (which is using a depricated C function that isn't included in glibc anymore, but is included with the Flatpak version of Steam so it's still playable with that) but they're solvable. I believe that's all.
I think PC gamers tend to overestimate their importance in OS distribution these days - gaming on Linux is just as passable these days as on Mac, and there's much more to PC use than only gaming for 90% of users.
I feel that PC use is more complicated than gamers/productivity - but having switched over full time this year, Linux clearly has some work to do so the average user doesn't need to touch the terminal - but even compared to 10 years ago its infinitely more capable and user friendly.
Customers of paid software need to start either voting with their feet meaningfully, or lobbying to get software support on Linux if they want it - complaining that titles aren't available for Linux and then continuing to suffer through windows instead of making that known to the devs is seen exactly the same way - a sale.
I certainly miss some windows only software - but I'm not going to be held captive anymore for programmes I paid for, that refuse to consider my needs, when they are a part of my wider usage and expectations.
We don't, there are a ton of online games that will not work on linux. I don't know why this is hard to understand. I love linux, but I have my main rig for gaming running windows, because it's easier and games just work on it.
Yeah well, play the game that have requirements that you pc supports. It's always been like that.
Huh? I do play the games my PC supports, which is all of them, because I on windows still...